Messages

46

Feature Requests / Re: Alias Groups

« on: March 18, 2016, 04:36:30 PM »

so, in 1.10 there is an ippool feature,  where you would create a pool , call it 'trusted sites' , and add those 3 ip addrs to the pool.

in your firewall rule you permit ip from that 'trusted sites' pool to 10.0.0.1 port 123

are you using 1.10 ?

47

General Questions / Re: Can't generate certificate

« on: March 17, 2016, 12:29:45 PM »

This was fixed in the last update

48

General Questions / Re: Imitation is the greatest form of flattery.

« on: March 17, 2016, 12:29:21 PM »

lol, though it is windows

49

Feature Requests / Re: WAN Failover / Sharing

« on: March 17, 2016, 12:28:18 PM »

it's the most asked for feature I think, but right now I have some bugs in ipf I need to figure out ...

50

Feature Requests / Re: Alias Groups

« on: March 17, 2016, 12:27:34 PM »

could you give me a detailed example ? i.e. what it looks like today ?

I did and an ippool feature , but only added it to the firewall rules , not to NAT , I could probably extend it to NAT

51

Installation / Re: Possible DHCP error

« on: March 04, 2016, 09:01:19 AM »

Great!  Onto the next bug

52

General Questions / Re: Can't generate certificate

« on: March 04, 2016, 07:35:55 AM »

I think that this is broken, will continue to look at it , hopefully will fix soon

53

Installation / Re: Possible DHCP error

« on: March 04, 2016, 07:35:09 AM »

it turns out the MAN page is incorrect and that it accepting a config like what the MAN page suggests is a bug.

the correct format is not

Code: [Select]

dhcp-range=set:opt2,192.168.5.10,192.168.5.20,static
but

Code: [Select]

dhcp-range=set:opt2,192.168.5.10,static
new build out in a few mins

54

Installation / Re: Possible DHCP error

« on: March 03, 2016, 02:11:31 PM »

damn, ok , I think i'll have to look at patching dnsmasq , I reported a bug, but I don't think I'll hear of a fix soon, so will have to look at fixing it ...

Thanks for testing !

55

Installation / Re: Possible DHCP error

« on: March 03, 2016, 09:51:35 AM »

I'm hoping this is fixed in b98 , if you can test please...

56

General Questions / Re: Can't generate certificate

« on: March 03, 2016, 12:11:45 AM »

that error is a bit misleading, it happens if you system date is < the firmware build date - 24h

you can check by executing 'date +%s' from exec.php and comparing to executing 'cat / etc / version.buildtime.unix'

but it also is the error when the cert generation failed (for any reason !) , i'll take a look

57

Installation / Re: Possible DHCP error

« on: March 02, 2016, 06:18:54 PM »

thanks, I look at the status.php see what needs to change.

i took a quick look, this is a bug in dnsmasq, that syntax is correct upto version 2.65 of dnsmasq, but 2.66 introduced a change that is behind this error.

I think we can work around it by adding the subnet mask at the end like this

Code: [Select]

dhcp-range=set:opt2,192.168.5.10,192.168.5.20,static,255.255.255.0
the 'static' parameter , is the mode of operation for the range, i.e. only issue static addresses.  I'll try look later see if that workaround will address the problem.

58

Installation / Re: Possible DHCP error

« on: March 02, 2016, 12:25:02 PM »

Thanks for the report, I'll take a look .

ISC dhcpd was replaced with dnsmasq recently, and thats where this bug came from i'm sure.  should be a quick fix

59

Hardware / Re: ALIX boards, max throughput?

« on: March 01, 2016, 02:48:35 PM »

if by QOS you mean the traffic shaper, it should work fine.

are you using 1.10 ? have you tried enabling fastforward to see if it makes any difference ?

the heat on the APU is distributed through the bottom of the case, it acks as a heat sink.  mine is warm, but so is my cable modem   there are some discussions on the internet around APU heat where people did various tests, which will have better data !

60

Hardware / Re: ALIX boards, max throughput?

« on: February 29, 2016, 09:59:53 PM »

oops, yes I meant APU , sorry !

ALIX, the nics are only 100Mbps, so 80-90 Mbps sounds right as the maximum throughput